See what’s planned. Find your next opportunity.

Follow planning and zoning changes in your area — without checking every city website.

We monitor planning and zoning activity across the cities we cover, so you don’t have to. Track proposed developments and zoning changes in your metro, see who’s filing, review the source documents where available, and get email alerts for projects matching your selected locations and keywords.

See projects in my city Start free alerts

Recent observed examples in Phoenix

The most recently processed rezonings across the metro whose hearing has passed or is not yet scheduled, as the packets state it.

Marana PCZ2603-001

Rezoning for Residential development, from Zone B (Medium Lot Zone) and Zone A (Small Lot Zone) to R-4 (Residential), 74 acres.

Request to rezone approximately 74 acres from legacy Zones A and B to R-4 (Residential) at the NW corner of W Marana Rd and N Wentz Rd for residential development at approximately 4-5 homes per acre. The proposal includes conditions for single-story homes adjacent to existing residences, landscape buffers, and infrastructure improvements, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions addressing compatibility with existing low-density rural and agricultural uses.

Where
NW corner of W Marana Rd and N Wentz Rd, Township 11S, Range 11E, Section 19, Marana
Hearing
Aug 26, 2026 · Marana Planning Commission
Observed
3 days ago

Marana PCZ2601-001

Rezoning for OVCN Twin Peaks Campus Specific Plan - multi-use building with worship, gymnasium, office, and meeting space; sports fields and recreation areas; parking, from R-36 (Residential) to SP (Specific Plan), 28.1 acres.

Request to rezone approximately 28.1 acres from R-36 (Residential) to SP (Specific Plan) to create the OVCN Twin Peaks Campus, a church campus development with a multi-use building, gymnasium, sports fields, and parking. The Specific Plan rezoning is necessary to increase maximum building height from 30 feet to 40 feet to accommodate the gymnasium, though the proposed uses are already permitted under existing zoning. The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to conditions.

Where
Southwest corner of W Twin Peaks Rd and W Desert Falcon Ln, Township 12S, Range 12E, Section 11, Marana
Hearing
Aug 26, 2026 · Marana Planning & Zoning Commission
Observed
3 days ago

Buckeye PLZZ-25-0013

Rezoning for New master planned community allowing up to 130,000 residential dwelling units and approximately 3,542 acres of non-residential development, from Planned Community (PC) with Douglas Ranch Community Master Plan (CMP) Overlay to Planned Area Development (PAD), 33939 acres.

Teravalis seeks rezoning of approximately 33,939 acres from Planned Community to Planned Area Development to establish a new master planned community framework for up to 130,000 residential dwelling units and 3,542 acres of non-residential development. The proposal replaces the previous Douglas Ranch Community Master Plan governance structure with a new PAD framework subject to land-use budget provisions.

Where
Approximately bounded by the Jomax alignment on the north, Thunderbird and Cactus Road alignments on the south, 319th and 298th Avenue alignments on the east, and 379th and 355th Avenue alignments on the west (formerly governed by Douglas Ranch Community Master Plan), Buckeye
Hearing
Oct 27, 2026 · Mayor and City Council
Observed
3 days ago

Get updates like these for your city.

  • Searchable local project records
  • Source documents where available
  • Matching email alerts

Public Planning & Zoning agendas from 28 Phoenix municipalities, read as each packet is captured. We extract the cases our reader supports; coverage and field completeness vary by city and packet. Alerts follow the processing of a matching case. Coverage →

28
Cities covered
1,046
Cases tracked
2 days
Portal publication → case on file (median, packets fetched in the last 30 days, archive backfills excluded)
5 days
Median advance notice, cases processed before their hearing

See how to research a local project

Follow a historical case from Plano, in our Dallas–Fort Worth coverage, from the city's records to its source packet, and note the questions to take back to the city or your client.

Watch the walkthrough · 2:34

Recorded September 2026 using historical records; the site may have changed since. Not a live feed.

Read the transcript

You are a real estate broker, builder or land buyer, and a client asks: what is being proposed around this area? P&Z Radar helps you investigate planning and zoning records in the places it covers. Let’s use Plano as an example. We’ll find a case, inspect what the record says, and identify the questions worth taking back to the city or your client.

First, check coverage. A city name alone is not enough: look at the source status and when its portal was read. This tells you where to start and where gaps may remain. P&Z Radar works from captured public documents, so the timing and detail depend on the city’s records. Once you know your market is represented, you can make the search much more specific.

On Projects, choose Plano. The table gives you case identifiers, locations, types and available details. You can use the other filters to focus your research further. Notice the label: this public page is a historical archive, not the full stream of upcoming cases. It is useful for seeing the kind of information available and understanding activity already on file before you decide whether monitoring is right for you.

Open a case and read the fields in context. Who is named? What use is proposed? Which location and hearing date appear? Where is the source packet? Those are useful inputs to a client conversation or a research brief. A staff recommendation is not the same as a final decision. If a summary and a status disagree, go to the source and resolve that difference before repeating either as a fact.

For a broker, this might raise a question about activity near a listing. For a land team, it might identify a proposed use worth investigating. For an engineering firm, it might show an applicant or project type to research. The next step is not to assume the land is available or the project approved. It is to carry better questions and a source link into the next conversation.

If that research is useful, the free city trial is the next place to look. Its page explains the recent cases and follow-on updates you can evaluate without a card. Review the city you select and the current terms before starting. Begin with one market you know well, compare the records with the city’s own source, and judge whether this saves you useful research time. That is a practical way to test P&Z Radar.

Download captions: SRT · VTT

See projects in my city

Why these records matter

Notice rarely reaches you. Where a city mails notice, it usually goes only to owners within a set distance of the site — often a few hundred feet, though the rule varies by state and city. Own land across the road or sit under contract nearby and you may be outside it, with no letter on the way.

The window can be short. Many cities post agendas close to their legal minimum, so a case can be filed, heard and decided between two weekly portal checks. Among the cases we processed before their hearing, the median advance notice is 5 days — a median across that population, not a promise for every case or city.

What that looks like: land going multi-family a block from your next closing; a neighbour assembling next to your holdings; a staff report recommending denial on a tract you’d buy at the right basis; a specific-use permit on the corner your listing faces.

Browse the records →

Two workers in hard hats and safety vests facing a building under construction

More than a filing alert

Follow a case, not just a filing

First observation, hearing scheduled, continued, advanced from Planning & Zoning to Council — each stage as we observe it on the agendas.

Know which deals are in trouble

We flag cases where the packet’s staff recommendation is denial, or that keep being continued. A switch sends you only those. That is a staff recommendation or a scheduling signal, not an official denial: we read agendas, not votes.

Watch your own land

Add properties you own or have under contract and pick a radius. Anything filed near one is reported with its distance and the property it’s next to — whether or not it matches your keywords. Cities mail notice only to owners within a short statutory distance of a site, which varies by state; our default ring is 1,000 feet.

Included in every plan →

How it works

  1. We check the portals. Each covered city’s P&Z agenda page, repeatedly; the coverage page shows when each was last read successfully. Special meetings and revised agendas are read when the portal lists them.
  2. The packet is read for you. The cases our reader supports become structured data: location, acreage, current and requested zoning, petitioner, owner, hearing date, and the staff recommendation where the packet states one. Fields the packet omits stay blank.
  3. You get only your matches. Set counties and keywords — “multi-family,” “SUP,” a competitor’s LLC, a road corridor. We email you when a case is processed, and nothing when it doesn’t match.

This replaces checking dozens of portals by hand and reading packets that run to hundreds of pages; a match reaches you as a short email once the captured packet is processed. Packets beyond our size limits are read as a bounded prefix.

When each portal was last read →

What an alert looks like

P&Z Radar — Planning and zoning intelligence
New zoning case
Marana · Pima County
PCZ2603-001
Residential development
Hearing
2026-08-26 Marana Planning Commission

Request to rezone approximately 74 acres from legacy Zones A and B to R-4 (Residential) at the NW corner of W Marana Rd and N Wentz Rd for residential development at approximately 4-5 homes per acre. The proposal includes conditions for single-story homes adjacent to existing residences, landscape buffers, and infrastructure improvements, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions addressing compatibility with existing low-density rural and agricultural uses.

LocationNW corner of W Marana Rd and N Wentz Rd, Township 11S, Range 11E, Section 19
Acreage74
Current zoningZone B (Medium Lot Zone) and Zone A (Small Lot Zone)
Requested zoningR-4 (Residential)
Proposed useResidential development
PetitionerPaul Oland of Paradigm Land Design
Staff recommendationapprove with conditions
View full case →
You're receiving this because your filter matched Marana.
Unsubscribe · P&Z Radar — municipal land signals
A real alert for a Marana case, redacted: the case number, the hearing date and body, what is proposed and where, and the staff recommendation where the packet states one. The source link goes to the city’s own agenda packet. You get one email like this each time a case matching your cities and keywords is processed.

Start free alerts

Who it’s for

Builders and development companies, brokers, land acquisition and assemblage teams, civil engineers and planners — and anyone following planning and zoning.

Builders and land acquisition teams

Rezonings and SUPs with acreage, requested zoning and petitioner as the packets list them, when the packet is captured — not when the sign goes up. A proposal is not an approval, and a staff recommendation is not a vote.

Brokers pitching listings

Know what’s moving around the property: case numbers, hearing dates, staff recommendations where stated.

Civil engineers & planners

Filings, what each city’s staff recommends, and how long items sit between stages. Outcomes are decided in minutes we don’t collect, so we won’t tell you what passed. Pull the same data by API and MCP.

API & MCP →

Data center intelligence

Data centers are the largest land, power and construction decisions most cities will see this decade, and they surface first in the same public record as every other project: a rezoning or specific-use request, a site plan, a substation or transmission item on the agenda. P&Z Radar reads those filings and records each project’s stage and next public decision as the packets state them, linked to the packet.

The result: a searchable record of proposed campuses by metro — who is filing, where, what is requested, the staff recommendation where the packet states one, and when the commission and council meet — reviewed before publication. Track the projects that matter to you and get a short brief when something changes.

7 reviewed projects in Phoenix today; 31 across 7 metros; 1 reviewed policy item (ordinances, text amendments, moratoria) on the policy watch; 3 candidates awaiting review here. Each project is counted once from its reviewed records. These include historical proposals and requests to permit data-center use; the count does not establish committed development or construction.

Explore data center intelligence

Watch the data center walkthrough · 2:41

What the section tracks

  • Proposals and site plans — case, parcel, acreage, petitioner and requested zoning, as filed.
  • Power, water and land — substation, transmission, water and road items filed with a project, as the packets describe them.
  • Decisions — first observation, hearing scheduled, continued, advanced to Council; the staff recommendation where the packet states one.
  • Community response — public comment and opposition items on the agenda.

For site selectors, utilities and suppliers, brokers and land teams, and local officials. A filing is a proposal until the commission votes and the site is permitted and built; we say what the record says and no more.

The Phoenix P&Z portals we check

Teal = a city we hold tracked cases from; grey = on the expansion list or no tracked cases yet; a white dot is a community covered through its county’s portal. Click a dot for the city.

Full coverage table and what each status means →

The next packet is on its way. Read it before the hearing.

Plans and pricing

14 days free · $99/mo for one city, $599/mo for the whole metro · cancel anytime.